The ForestKeepers agreed to pull their negative campaign when the Forest Service told them it was inappropriate to solicit negative comments during a collaborative trail planning process.
Thanks to many of you, the public has spoken out overwhelmingly in favor of keeping existing trails open to multiple use and the Sequoia National Forest has responded with a plan keeping many roads and trails open to everyone.
|
|
The ForestKeepers attempting to pit recreation groups against one another has no place in our valley. Now more than ever is a time to work together to help keep our roads and trails open so everyone can enjoy their pubic lands and bring more recreation dollars into our struggling local economy. There is enough Forest for all of us to enjoy.
Chris Horgan
Stewards of the Sequoia
Editor’s note: The accuracy of the claims alleged in Mr. Horgan’s letter have not been verified.


Comments
69 comment(s)Wendy wrote on Feb 26, 2010 8:48 AM:
Mac wrote on Feb 25, 2010 7:36 AM:
Mac wrote on Feb 25, 2010 7:31 AM:
Truth wrote on Feb 24, 2010 7:42 PM:
Mac wrote on Feb 24, 2010 9:05 AM:
Truth wrote on Feb 23, 2010 9:06 PM:
Robert Palmer Rhoads wrote on Feb 23, 2010 4:12 PM:
I did some research on SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER and their funds.
In 2008 they (AKA: ARA MARDEROSIAN) claim on their (his) 990-EZ (short form with NO itemization of funds) that they received $110,073 and from that they paid out $126,141 for salaries, other compensations and employee benefits. Of that ALMOST HALF was paid to MR. MARDEROSIAN. $60,000
I think that in itself speaks volumes.
Source:
guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2008/912/154/2008-912154817-051abb03-Z.pdf
Signed
4th generation native son to Kern River Valley "
John Perry wrote on Feb 21, 2010 7:55 PM:
To spread unseemly gossip and then hide behind a screen name is cowardly and ignorant.
It is my opinion that Hayduke, Sasquatch and local one are probably members of the SFK.
It's been my experience that preservationist groups will do whatever is required to accomplish their agenda.
Don't buy into the published SFK rhetoric. Go to their website, find out what they are really about.
It's my opinion after studying their website that THEY WANT TO CLOSE THE FOREST TO ALL HUMAN USE. "
Jill Dey wrote on Feb 21, 2010 2:52 PM:
Prove to me that the environmentalists really care. Or is it just another way to bring in funds and line pockets? "
Local One wrote on Feb 21, 2010 2:33 PM:
Wendy wrote on Feb 20, 2010 9:03 AM:
John Perry wrote on Feb 19, 2010 10:53 PM:
There are very few that have ridden more miles than myself in the Piutes. I've met two gentlemen on horse back, one hiker on a road. The horsemen asked directions, we had nice 20 minutes conversation. The hiker smiled and waved as I drove by slowly.
Have the courage to sign your name or are you a coeardly member of the SFK?
In my opinion,you lie. "
Sierra Clubber wrote on Feb 19, 2010 6:26 PM:
Wendy wrote on Feb 18, 2010 10:01 AM:
John Perry wrote on Feb 16, 2010 10:22 PM:
Your statement is typical of under educated zealots.
If you cannot argue a point in an intellectual manner with facts you attempt to destroy those you disagree with by casting aspersions and juvenile name calling.
Are you a member of the SFK or are you other names Hayduke or Sasquatch? "
Local One wrote on Feb 16, 2010 4:26 PM:
Wendy wrote on Feb 16, 2010 10:00 AM:
Paul Adley wrote on Feb 16, 2010 7:54 AM:
Chris, here comes a $100 bucks to help you look after my trout stocking, trail riding, hot springing, lake-side interests in Kern Valley. "
local in the know wrote on Feb 14, 2010 4:13 PM:
The off road noisy group is the most selfish group I've met. They buy noisy, gas hogging machines and make us hikers eat their dust when they go by.
Sorry but someone had to tell the truth. "
Robert Baldwin wrote on Feb 13, 2010 6:04 PM:
That protection can only come with access. "
John Perry wrote on Feb 12, 2010 6:44 PM:
Look at all the appeals they have filed virtually every time the SNF has attempted to manage our forest.
Each of these has to be answered by the SNF at great expense in time and money.
I wonder how much tax money this has cost us and the SNF.
I think it is time for all of us to ask this group where their money comes from and what is their expertise in Forest Management. "
Scott Atchison wrote on Feb 10, 2010 9:11 AM:
mtnmomma wrote on Feb 10, 2010 8:55 AM:
Agree with Stewards wrote on Feb 9, 2010 1:35 PM:
"Access by humans, including the Forest Service, and mechanical equipment increase the chances for human-caused fires."
That pretty much sums up their philosophy.
Trees aren't for people. Nature isn't for people. KEEP OUT.
And by the way, Forestkeeper often SUES WITH the Center for Biological Diversity that STOPPED the TROUT STOCKING. "
John Perry wrote on Feb 8, 2010 3:45 PM:
You did not answer my question.Why?
I think we all have seen less than Factual statements published in your paper and you did nothing to verify the statements or post an editors note.
I asked Cathy Perfect about this one day and she responded that they were not responsible for statements made on the blogs nor did they have time to verify them.
Are the ForestKeepers now making editorial decisions for your paper or do you have a conflict of interest in this matter? "
John Perry wrote on Feb 8, 2010 3:32 PM:
You claimed that most of the Piute Fire burned mostly in the previously logged areas. This is not factual.
Look at the FS burn map. You will see a large WELL MANAGED area right in the middle that did not burn. A replanted old clear cut area did burn.
This was the area that the FS wanted to thin. Your group joined in a law suit and stopped the thinning so now it's destroyed.
Why were you soliciting complaints about OHVs under your name on the
ForestKeeper website? "
Valerie Cassity wrote on Feb 8, 2010 1:42 PM:
Editor wrote on Feb 8, 2010 1:27 PM:
Today, I spoke with Mary Chislock, USFS Public Affairs Officer. She told me, 'It is not our role to act as a gatekeeper on a non-profit group's website.' She confirmed the USFS did not intervene. "
John Perry wrote on Feb 8, 2010 9:35 AM:
Have you ever added this note to any letter from members of the Sequoia ForestKeepers? "
Jack Webb wrote on Feb 8, 2010 6:51 AM:
Philip McNamara wrote on Feb 7, 2010 9:44 PM:
Gail Korner wrote on Feb 7, 2010 8:06 PM:
deb marsolini wrote on Feb 7, 2010 6:16 PM:
Cathy wrote on Feb 7, 2010 6:15 PM:
John Perry wrote on Feb 7, 2010 2:24 PM:
Why is this necessary? Is this a sneaky apology to the ForestKeepers for publishing Mr. Horgans letter?
Why did you not add the same ed. note to sasquatch's post? He impugned
Chris Horgans integrity.
I think you owe Mr. Horgan an apology.
As for full disclosure, I have lined the Stewards pockets with a $30.00 donation.
A newspaper that is run by true Journalists is careful not to give the appearance of taking sides. "
Andy Lofquist wrote on Feb 7, 2010 7:14 AM:
John Perry wrote on Feb 6, 2010 11:38 PM:
Service
It's the same ForestKeeper preservationist mentality that's eliminated the stocking of the Kern River and allowed millions of acres of forests to be consumed by wildfire.
Go to sharetrails.org and sign up for their legislative and forest service alerts that effect our access.
Write letters to the editor, your legislators and other outdoor recreational groups.
And join the Stewards of the Sequoia. "
Jim Boyd wrote on Feb 6, 2010 8:48 PM:
Tor Anderson wrote on Feb 6, 2010 3:45 PM:
A good example of the minimal impact multiple use trails have, is how quickly the forest tries to reclaim them. Without maintenance most trails almost disappear within a season or two.
We should all be thankful for those the volunteer to keep trails open for all. "
JoAnn Jones wrote on Feb 6, 2010 2:51 PM:
I would also go on record as stating that I have never seen anyone donate so much time, and effort, to keeping trails open than Chris. "
Wendy wrote on Feb 6, 2010 12:28 PM:
John Perry wrote on Feb 6, 2010 12:10 PM:
Last year the ForestKeepers were soliciting negative comments about OHV users on their web site. When I cited this in a letter to the editor the solicitation mysteriously disappeared.
The Stewards have been instrumental in keeping open many miles of trails for the use of EVEYONE. What has the ForestKeepers done for us?
Many millions of acres of our precious forest have been destroyed by fire due to the efforts of preservationist groups like the Sequoia ForestKeepers. "
Mike Koroknay wrote on Feb 6, 2010 11:44 AM:
a trail needs work, and campgrounds signage needs repair. The BLM and USFS knows who will get the job done. I am so over the vomit-tory, woodpeckering whining. Get out and help maintain the (OUR) environment. "
Steve Hess wrote on Feb 6, 2010 11:43 AM:
Clif Seward wrote on Feb 6, 2010 11:12 AM:
recreational use for "all" users. Since we cannot rely on our politicians and bureaucrats to provide this. We must rely on the volunteer efforts of organized user groups like Stewards of the Sequoia and Chris Horgan. "
Scott Bain wrote on Feb 6, 2010 11:07 AM:
Alfred wrote on Feb 6, 2010 11:03 AM:
BZane wrote on Feb 6, 2010 10:49 AM:
All have two options; travel to wilderness to pack and hike pristine trails or to areas with trails reserved for shared access.
Numbers prove the vast majority of forest visitors prefer the latter.
Both areas provide ample recreational opportunities for all it seems except for you and a small group of self-righteous "Forest Watch" malcontents
Deny me forest areas reserved for shared access then banish you, too.
From your comments I'm certain you leave only piles and puddles in your wake. "
Michael Scott wrote on Feb 6, 2010 10:24 AM:
Jess McKinley wrote on Feb 6, 2010 10:21 AM:
Tim Lane wrote on Feb 6, 2010 10:08 AM:
Jim Morton wrote on Feb 6, 2010 9:24 AM:
Vinnie Barbarino wrote on Feb 6, 2010 9:22 AM:
Nick wrote on Feb 6, 2010 8:26 AM:
Tom wrote on Feb 6, 2010 8:20 AM:
Jeanne wrote on Feb 6, 2010 7:59 AM:
Glen Maki wrote on Feb 6, 2010 7:26 AM:
John Wiltsey wrote on Feb 6, 2010 7:07 AM:
mike graves wrote on Feb 6, 2010 6:59 AM:
I donate money to Stewards of the Sequoias. I have come across Chris while hiking, riding , and public meetings. He is calm, reasonable, and tolerant. He supports multiple use. I frequently cannot attend meetings and make comments like Chris does. Frankly, I fall short in the effort to protect public access to our great outdoors: That is why I donate to the Stewards.
In contrast, what I see from Sasquatch are accusations. What I see from Hayduke is intolerance, false claims, hyperbole, and name calling.
That’s not nice, that’s a smear. "
MuirMan wrote on Feb 6, 2010 1:27 AM:
Philip wrote on Feb 5, 2010 11:27 PM:
John Perry wrote on Feb 5, 2010 11:21 PM:
How many miles of trails have you cleared?
How much have you hiked, ridden your horse or bike in the forest?
Have you witnessed the devastation in the Piutes caused by a law suit in which the the Sequoia ForestKeepers joined?
OHV riders have donated well over a million dollars to the SNF in the last 3 years and thousands of hours of labor. Have the forest keepers? "
Trey wrote on Feb 5, 2010 11:04 PM:
Family Recreation wrote on Feb 5, 2010 10:55 PM:
Jimmy Lewis wrote on Feb 5, 2010 10:55 PM:
Don wrote on Feb 5, 2010 10:29 PM:
Clearly, Hayduke does not believe that disabled people, including our Disabled Veterans have any right to access public lands. It's only for health people like him. Well, Hayduke, I very much hope you are not disabled someday, and have to hear from people that you have no business enjoying public lands. Your selfishness saddens me. "
Chris Horgan wrote on Feb 5, 2010 3:20 PM:
However who lines the Sequoia ForestKeepers pockets so they can afford to file lawsuits blocking much needed management of our forest to thin our overgrown forests? "
Sasquatch wrote on Feb 4, 2010 11:23 PM:
Hayduke wrote on Feb 4, 2010 11:15 PM: